all the data and figures plotted and then we will decide which to use. Preferably these should not be rubbish.Īll papers should start with an outline - i.e.
tiff fileĦ - All papers need a graphical abstract. Use ‘insert picture’ function to insert a. arial) do not paste text as Calibri into it (Use paste and match formatting options)ĥ - Never copy and paste figures into a word file. You normally have to edit these.Ĥ - Do no mess up template files. Do NOT trust the endnote style file to be correct. Gibson) do not use abbrevations (M.I.Gibson).ģ - Citation style - check the citation style by looking at current papers in the journal we send to.
#MALVERN ZETASIZER FILE TO EXCEL FULL#
If the author list using full names (e.g Matthew I. IF the title can only be 20 words long, it should not be more than 20 words long. This way I can edit the data directly.Ģ - READ instructions. It will also contain templates for writing reports including those for experimental sections, chem draw figure settings etc.ġ - All figures to be made in origin (excel is rubbish) and the pasted (using Ctrl+J then Ctrl+V - no other combination works) into a powerpoint slide. The particle-size distributions before (original powder) and after grinding (recommended recipe) are compared to obtain the final data.This page will contain links to group presentation templates and useful items such as University Logos etc. In this way, it is possible to select the appropriate parameters for grinding such that the resulting particle diameters become small and almost uniform. The results clearly show that the crushed sample has smaller particle sizes and a sharper size distribution when smaller diameter zirconia balls are used. The above graph and the table show that D50 is approximately constant, but D90 and the volume percentage (%) are quite different from each other. Next, the results for samples ground using three types of zirconia balls with diameters of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mm are shown. Volume percentage: The highest volume percentage of the particle size distribution displayed. Also known as the median diameter.ĭ90: The portion of particles with diameters below this value is 90%. In the laser diffraction method, “D10”, “D50”, “D90” (horizontal axis) and “volume percentage (Volume (%))” (vertical axis) indicate the following values.ĭ10: The portion of particles with diameters smaller than this value is 10%ĭ50: The portions of particles with diameters smaller and larger than this value are 50%. The results of actual measurement of the particle sizes of a sample are as follows.
#MALVERN ZETASIZER FILE TO EXCEL HOW TO#
How to analyze results of particle-size distribution measurement Please provide the information on these refractive indices at the time of requesting the grinding test. Therefore, the refractive index of the solvent and that of the sample are required for the measurement. It is necessary to compare the scattering patterns of both theoretical and measured results in the process of determining the particle-size distribution. In this method, the sample is irradiated by laser light and the particle-size distribution of the sample is determined from the intensity pattern of diffracted and scattered light. Outline of particle size distribution analyzer with laser diffractionĪfter wet grinding of a sample using NP-100, the particle size distribution is measured by the laser diffraction method. The company adopts the “laser diffraction and scattering method” (hereinafter referred to as the laser diffraction method), by which a relatively wide range of particle sizes can be measured. There are several types of particle-size distribution analyzers. By measuring the particle size of a sample before and after grinding using a particle-size distribution analyzer, the extent to which the sample has been crushed can be confirmed.
0 kommentar(er)
